Legal Opinion

Avaun Johnson v. Warden, FCI Berlin

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided February 24, 2021No. 20-cv-920-JDPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Avaun Johnson v. Civil No. 20-cv-920-JD Opinion No.

2021 DNH 042

Warden, FCI Berlin O R D E R Avaun Johnson, proceeding pro se, brings a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, alleging that his due process rights were violated in a disciplinary proceeding while he was held at FCI Fort Dix. The government moves to dismiss the petition, contending that Johnson does not allege a due process violation and cannot raise a new claim that was not previously exhausted. Johnson did not respond to the motion to dismiss. Standard of Review In…

2Cases cited9 opinions

Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
Peter Bistrian v. Troy LeviCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
Reeb v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
Surprenant v. RivasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
Lyman v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Johnson v. FCI Berlin, WardenDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2021