Legal Opinion

State v. Payne & Bond

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 11, 2014No. 85/13Published

1Opinion of the Court

State of Maryland v. Joseph William Payne & Jason Bond, No. 85, Sept. Term 2013, Opinion by Battaglia, J. EVIDENCE – SUBJECT OF EXPERT TESTIMONY UNDER RULE 5-702 – TECHNICAL PROCESSES Trial court erred by allowing a police officer, who was not qualified as an expert under Maryland Rule 5-702, to testify as to the location of the cell phone towers through which the defendants’ cell phone calls were routed as determined by his analysis of the defendants’ cell phone records, because such testimony requires that the witness be qualified as an expert. EVIDENCE – HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS – PARTY OPPONENT…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Michigan v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. United States v. SmallsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API