Legal Opinion

Reiger v. . Worth

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 27, 1900PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover damages of defendant on account of a breach of warranty, the form of the action being that formerly known as "case." The plaintiff bought of the defendant a quantity of rice, which he alleged the defendant represented to be good seed rice, but which was in fact not good seed rice, and which failed to sprout after having been planted, although the land was well prepared. The plaintiff further alleged that it was too (231) late, after he discovered that the rice was worthless for seed, and had failed to germinate, to plant for another crop.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sledge v. . Reid, Sheriff, C.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  2. Van Wyck v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. MacE v. . RamseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  4. Foard v. Atlantic & North Carolina Rail RoadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1860
  5. Bridgers v. . DillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gore v. George J. Ball, IncorporatedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Vaughan's Seed Store v. StringfellowSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  3. E. P. Moorhead v. Minneapolis Seed Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. Baumgartner v. GlesenerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. Parris v. H. G. Fischer & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API