Darvin Webb v. Railroad Retirement Board
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WEICK, Chief Judge.
This is a proceeding to review a decision of the Railroad Retirement Board which adjudged that petitioner was not entitled to an increase in his occupational benefits of $98.70 a month, which were awarded to him under Section 2(a), par. 4 of the Railroad Retirement Act 1 (45 U.S.C. § 228b(a), par. 4). His claim before the Board was that he was entitled to additional benefits pursuant to the over-all minimum guaranty provisions contained in Section 3(e) of the Act 2 (45 U.S.C. § 228c(e)).
In allowing petitioner the occupational benefits of $98.70 a month, the Board determined…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- William T. Miracle v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- Ora P. Hall v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
- Ora P. Hall v. Arthur S. Flemming, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
- Carl Massey v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare,defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sam May v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
- Augusta Parker v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Zane F. Chandler v. United States of America Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Floyd Crenshaw v. United States of America Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987