Legal Opinion

Richard Bell v. Vacuforce, LLC

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 14, 2018No. 18-1159; 18-1368PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hamilton, Circuit Judge.

Richard Bell brought a copyright infringement lawsuit against Vacuforce, LLC, accusing it of publishing his photograph of the Indianapolis skyline on its website without a license. Vacuforce hired attorney Paul Overhauser to defend it. The parties quickly settled, so the federal lawsuit was dismissed with prejudice.

That was not the end of the story. Overhauser then moved to recover attorney fees from plaintiff Bell. He argued that since the settlement produced a dismissal with prejudice, Vacuforce was the "prevailing party" for purposes of fees under the Copyright Act,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Puffer v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  4. In re TCI Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Hoskins v. DartCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Matter Of LisseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  2. Wizenberg v. Wizenberg (In re Wizenberg)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2019
  3. BELL v. CARMEN COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE SERVICESDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020
  4. BELL v. INTEGRITY WHOLESALE FURNITURE, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2021
  5. Catalina Holdings (Bermuda) Limited v. Jennifer Hammer, Director of Insurance of the State of Illinois, as Liquidator of Legion Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API