Legal Opinion
McConnell v. McConnell
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided November 12, 1912PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Moses N. Sale, Judge. The court had jurisdiction. Sec. 2373, R. S. 1909; Cheatham v. Cheatham, 10 Mo. 296; Gordon v. Gordon, 128 Mo. App. 710; Johnson v. Johnson, 95 Mo.' App. 329.
1Opinion of the CourtNortoni, J.
This is a suit for divorce. After hearing the testimony, the court dismissed the petition, and plaintiff prosecutes the appeal from that judgment. In support of its ruling, the trial court filed a written memorandum containing a concise statement of the facts and its conclusion of “law thereon. This memorandum opinion prepared by the trial judge will suffice here, and we, therefore, set it out as follows:
“This is a suit for divorce filed by the plaintiff, who lives in New York City, in the state of New York, and who has never lived or resided in the city of St. Louis, or in the State of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kruse v. KruseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857
3Cited by4 opinions
- Worthington v. District Court of the Second Judicial DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 1914
- Phelps v. PhelpsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1952
- Cox v. CoxMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Sharp v. SharpMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967