Legal Opinion
Ball v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 21, 1948No. 9233PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.
This is a conspiracy suit under the Sherman and Clayton Acts.1 Plaintiff-appellant is the owner and operator of the Penn motion picture theatre in Ambridge, Pennsylvania. The defendants-appellees are Penn-ware Theatre Corporation, formerly lessee of the Penn Theatre and later owner and operator of the State Theatre, also in Am-bridge; A. N. Notopoulos and Paramount Pictures, Inc., each owning fifty per cent of the Pennware stock; R. K. O. Radio Pictures, Inc., Loew’s, Inc., Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation and Paramount Film Distributing Corporation, producers,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- United States v. GriffithSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Overseas Motors, Inc. v. Import Motors Limited, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1974
- Milgram v. Loew's, Inc. (Hamilton Street Realty Company, Intervenors)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Sanabria v. Sucn. de González MartinezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
- In Re Kellett Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- The Associated Press v. Taft-Ingalls Corporation, Formerly Known as the Cincinnati Times-Star CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.