Legal Opinion

Trustees of Kilbourn Lodge v. Kilbourn

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1889PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Milwaukee County. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

The appellant commenced an action against the respondents and Frank M. Hoyt and Le Grand Kniifen in the superior court of Milwaukee county, and in such action filed a complaint against all the defendants, demanding equitable relief against all of them. To this complaint Frank M. Hoyt answered. Kniffen does not appear to *453have answered or demurred. The other defendants, the Kilboums, Thorndike, McOallum, and Yizay, demurred to the complaint, alleging as ground of demurrer that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action as to them. Upon the hearing of this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Supervisors of Kewaunee County v. DeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Denner v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Gormely v. Gymnastic Ass'n of the South Side of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Tewksbury v. SchulenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stein v. BenedictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Kruczinski v. NeuendorfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Gullickson v. MadsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Hoff v. OlsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  5. State Ex Rel. Dame v. LefevreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API