Legal Opinion
Childers v. Mineta
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 26, 2001No. CIV.A.97-853(RMU)PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Granting the Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint
I. INTRODUCTION
This employment-discrimination matter comes before the court upon the plaintiffs motion for leave to amend the complaint. The plaintiff is suing her employer, the Secretary of the Department of Transportation (“the defendant” or “DOT”), alleging failure to reasonably accommodate the plaintiffs disability in violation of 29 U.S.C. §§ 791 and 794a, and race and gender discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- James Madison Limited, by Norman F. Hecht, Sr., Assignee v. Eugene A. Ludwig, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Brian P. Moore v. Agency for International DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Williams v. SavageDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Smith v. Cafe AsiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Fam v. Bank of America NA (USA)District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- McGee v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Lawrence v. GeithnerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.