People v. Romero
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The record demonstrates that the defendant’s plea of guilty was entered knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily (see People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, 543 [1993]; People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9, 17 [1983]). Contrary to the defendant’s contention, his plea was not rendered invalid by the County Court’s failure to advise him of the possible immigration consequences of his plea (see CPL 220.50 [7]; People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 403 [1995]; People v Sanchez-Martinez, 35 AD3d 632, 633 [2006]; cf. Padilla v Kentucky, 559 US —, 130 S Ct 1473 [2010]).
The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. FiumefreddoNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. WiedmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. FrancoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. RamnaraineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. PequeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.