Legal Opinion

In Re Lanza

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey

Decided July 16, 1985No. 07-25847PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EMIL F. GOLDHABER, Chief Judge: 1

The pivotal inquiry brought before the bench on the debtor’s objection to a bank’s proofs of claim, is whether the evidence supports a .bank’s entitlement to the three claims at issue, notwithstanding its apparent gross deviations from standard banking practice. After carefully weighing the evidence, we will reduce the amount of the first claim but uphold the remaining two in full.

We recapitulate the facts of this contro versy as follows: 2 The debtors filed a petition for reorganization under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (“the Code”). Against the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. In Re Trending Cycles for Commodities, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1982
  3. Mariner of Pennsville, Inc. v. S.T.G. Enterprises, Inc. (In Re S.T.G. Enterprises, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Satelco, Inc. v. North American Publishers, Inc. (In Re Satelco, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1986
  2. C-4 Media Cable South, L.P. v. Reds T v. & Cable, Inc. (In Re C-4 Media Cable South, L.P.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992
  3. In Re SmithUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
  4. In re LanzaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API