Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Harris

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 30, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonahue, J.

This is an action against the defendant as the executrix of the will of her deceased husband, who was an indorser of a note for $10,000 secured by a second mortgage of real estate, to recover a deficiency after a foreclosure sale. The note was actually owned by one Pinanski and one Green who assigned it to the plaintiff for the purpose of bringing this action. The defendant’s testa*484tor owned a one-third interest in the equity in the mortgaged real estate, the owners of the other two thirds being one Goldfine and one Carmen. The case was tried on certain facts agreed upon at the trial and on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hill v. West End Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  2. Cambridge Savings Bank v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Marsh v. BeraldiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  4. Commonwealth v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. McCarthy v. SimonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sandler v. SilkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Fulton v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Davis v. Newburyport Five Cents Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. Ross v. VadeboncoeurMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  5. McGillivray v. EramianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API