Legal Opinion

Wade & Dunton, Inc. v. Gordon

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 28, 1949PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurchie, J.

Defendant’s exceptions in this case, heard by a single Justice of the Superior Court without the intervention of a jury, with the right of exceptions reserved on questions of law, allege as errors that there was no consideration for what was found to be a contract justifying the recovery allowed and that the provision of that contract for the payment of the $400 awarded as liquidated damages imposed a penalty having no connection with actual damages, none such having been suffered.

A breach of contract by the defendant is undoubted, if there was a contract. The plaintiff is an automobile…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Robbins v. PlantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  2. Chabot & Richard Co. v. ChabotSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1912
  3. Dwinel v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1867
  4. White v. OakesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1896
  5. Burrill v. DaggettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Interstate Industrial Uniform Rental Service, Inc. v. Couri Pontiac, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  2. Central Maine Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1960
  3. Pacheco v. ScoblionkoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  4. Stanford Motor Co. v. WestmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Elizabethtown Lincoln Mercury v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API