Legal Opinion
Consul, Ltd. v. Transco Energy Co.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided October 31, 1984No. C-82-574-WSPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ERWIN, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendants’ motions for partial summary judgment on plaintiff’s cause of action under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2. For the reasons which follow, the court will allow both of the defendants’ motions.
The Parties
The plaintiff Consul, Ltd. (Consul), is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of North Carolina, with its principal place of business in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. During all pertinent times herein, Consul was engaged in, among other things, the business…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- John L. Broadway v. City of Montgomery, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Oma H. Hester, Jr. v. Martindale-Hubbell, Inc. American Bar Association and North Carolina State BarCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Terry's Floor Fashions, Inc. v. Burlington Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1983
- Hester v. Martindale-Hubbell, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1980
3Cited by3 opinions
- Consul, Ltd. v. Transco Energy Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Virginia Vermiculite, Ltd. v. W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2000
- Consul, Ltd. v. Transco Energy Company, Formerly Known as Transco Companies, Inc., and Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation, (Two Cases) Consul, Ltd. v. Transco Energy Company, Formerly Known as Transco Companies, Inc., and Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986