Legal Opinion

Aaron Lindh v. James P. Murphy, Warden

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 11, 1997No. 95-3608PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.

The Supreme Court remanded this case to us for resolution under the law that preceded the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996. See Lindh v. Murphy, — U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 2059, 138 L.Ed.2d 481 (1997). Our full court returned this case to the panel for disposition. Because the case has been briefed and argued twice in this court, the first time before the aedpa’s adoption, further briefs and argument are unnecessary. To abbreviate exposition, we assume that the reader is familiar with the Supreme Court’s decision and our prior opinion, 96 F.3d 856 (7th…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. BoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. SappCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. United States v. KohringCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. Eric R. Meyer and Gordon O. Hoff, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. Martin, TroyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API