In Re Interest of Clouse
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, Judge:
This is an appeal from the order of the lower court refusing to return a child to her natural parents and continuing custody of that child with her foster parents. We affirm. The hearing judge correctly defined the legal issues; he had a fully developed record; and he has submitted a comprehensive opinion discussing the evidence and explaining his findings and conclusions. As it happens, I agree with him; but even if I did not, we should affirm, for we must defer to a judge who has seen the parties and has a more sensitive feeling for the case than we can possibly achieve simply…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gunter v. GunterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth ex rel. Grillo v. ShusterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- In the Interest of LaRueSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Rinker AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Stapleton v. Dauphin County Child Care ServiceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- In Re Custody of HernandezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Tyler v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Tobias v. TobiasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Scarlett v. ScarlettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Sipe v. ShafferSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.