Hammond v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
On Return to Remand
On December 2, 1994, we remanded this case to the trial court with instructions that that court take the necessary action to provide us with a supplemental record of a portion of the voir dire proceedings relating to the challenges for cause of venirepersons Danny Ceasar, Wade Morrison, Janice Rivers, William Melvin, Verdell Tigg, and Otho Leanord. Hammond v.State, 665 So.2d 968 (Ala.Cr.App. 1994). We found that because of the absence from the record of the voir dire examination and of the challenges for cause pertaining to those six venirepersons we could not properly…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ross v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Gray v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ross v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
- Ex Parte GodboltSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ex Parte LandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Ex Parte ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Shanklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2014
- Ex Parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.