Legal Opinion

Ragland v. Cone

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 13, 1938No. 4863PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STOKES, Justice.

This cause was decided by this court and affirmed upon condition of a remittitur on the 28th of February, 1938, 114 S.W.2d 620. On May 11, 1938, appellant filed a motion for rehearing which was overruled. The remits titur was duly filed and, upon payment of the costs, minus an item of $69 hereinafter discussed, the mandate was issued and forwarded to the clerk of the trial court. Upon filing in this court by the appellee of a motion to re-tax the costs and eliminate the item of $69, the mandate was stayed and the case is now before us upon the motion to re-tax the costs.

The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dennis v. KendrickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Albright v. CorleyTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Paris v. Du BoseTexas Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Sumrall v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Talbert v. BarbourCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rosetta v. RosettaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Hutchins v. SeifertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  3. Aetna Ins. Co. v. AvirittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  4. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad v. AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Coleman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API