Legal Opinion
United States v. Harold Fox, Also Known as Rich
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 31, 2005No. 03-3554PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DORR, District Judge.
Harold Fox was charged in the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska with conspiracy to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine and use of a firearm during or in relation to a drug trafficking crime. A jury convicted Fox on both counts and the district court 2 sentenced Fox to 168 months of imprisonment on Count I and 60 months of imprisonment on Count II, to run consecutively. Fox appeals his conviction, arguing that the district court abused its discretion and violated his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation. For the reasons discussed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Ralph Chavous Duke, Also Known as Plookie, Also Known as PlukeyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. Louis F. PiraniCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Ernest Nda Akpan Chijioke Victor Okoro, M.D., Also Known as Victor Okoro, Also Known as Chiji v. OkoroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Leo Adams, United States of America v. Carl ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Hashim Amin CawthornCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Marvin SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.