Legal Opinion
Cannon v. Tinkham
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 27, 1938No. 7083PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellee, Tinkham, has filed a motion to strike the bill of exceptions and affirm the judgment. We think the motion should be granted.
The case was tried below to a jury, and on February S, 1937, the trial judge directed a verdict for defendant. Motion for a new trial, made on February 5th, was overruled on July 2d and judgment entered. On that day an appeal was noted to this court. Under law rule 46 of the District Court of the United States for the District oí Columbia bills of exceptions must be filed with the clerk of that court within the time fixed by the rules of this court, and by rule…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Exporters of Manufacturers' Products, Inc. v. Butterworth-Judson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- American Nat. Red Cross v. Raven Honey Dew MillsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- United States v. KonstovichCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- Ritz Carlton Restaurant & Hotel Co. of Atlantic City v. GillespieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tendler v. L. E. Massey, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- Joerns v. IrvinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Saul v. SaulCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Joerns v. IrvinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940