Legal Opinion

Qarbon. Com Inc. v. eHelp Corp.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 26, 2004No. C 03-04319 JWPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

WARE, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

In this patent infringement case, the Court considers whether affirmative defenses and counterclaims stated in conclu-sory terms provide sufficient notice under Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff Qarbon.com Incorporated (“Qarbon”) filed a motion to dismiss Defendant eHelp Corporation’s (“eHelp”) three affirmative defenses and two counterclaims pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Sterling Usher v. City of Los Angeles, Richard A. Gonzales, Michael E. Melton, Jose E. Ramirez, Joe Rios, and Robert L. VannCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Western Mining Council v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. Robert S. Robertson v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Cardinal Chemical Co. v. Morton International, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Kohler v. Staples the Office Superstore, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2013
  2. Rosen v. Masterpiece Marketing Group, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
  3. Mag Instrument, Inc. v. JS Products, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2008
  4. Polk v. Legal Recovery Law OfficesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2013
  5. Harris v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2014

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API