Legal Opinion

Diez v. Diez

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 28, 1951No. 39764PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOISE, Justice.

Defendant, George Diez, Jr., prosecutes this appeal from a judgment of the district court which granted Mrs. Parilee Roddy Diez, his third wife, a divorce, a vinculo *577matrimonii, on the grounds of adultery alleged to have been committed by defendant in the early morning of July 31, 1949. The judgment also awarded to plaintiff $35 per month as alimony, and $200 as attorney’s fees. Defendant has appealed.

The sole question before us is one of fact: Does the evidence in the record justify our finding of manifest error in the trial court’s judgment that defendant-appellant was guilty…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Le BlancSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  2. Thornton v. EllingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
  3. Lejeune v. LejeuneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  4. Martin v. MartinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
  5. Dessalles v. TichenorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Buxton v. McKendrickSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  2. Michel v. EffersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  3. Nalty v. NaltySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  4. Russell v. Niagara Fire Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Michel v. EffersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API