Buxton v. McKendrick
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
MOISE, Justice.
The voluminous records in this litigation disclose that there are two separate suits involved — No. 40,803 and No. 40,804, which have never been consolidated. These suits represent two different causes of action, with separate litigants, imposing on the trial judge great labor and added responsibility, and necessitating the rendering of separate and distinct judgments. 223 La. 79, 64 So.2d 850. We take it that the defendants let all bars down because of the charge of fraudulent conspiracy, and thus, the reason for taking evidence in both cases at the same time.
We will now…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planting Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
- Sanders v. SandersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- Eals v. SwanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- Strauss v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Cormier v. DouetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Bunge Corp. v. Gatx Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Company v. Hattie A. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Hall v. Arkansas-Louisiana Gas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- Automatic Coin Enterprises, Inc. v. Vend-Tronics, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
- Capital Bank & Trust Co. v. CoreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.