Legal Opinion

Eatontown v. Hendrickson

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 13, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The motion is to strike the bill, which has for its object, the withdrawing of a suit from the law courts on the ground that accounts in issue are too complicated for a jury trial to result in a just verdict.

The bill discloses that the complainant, the town of Eatontown, brought suit in the supreme court against Hendrickson, a former tax collector and his bondsman, to recover taxes collected by him during his term, 1921 to 1926, and misappropriated. The cause was sent to a referee, under objection, who reported a defalcation of $29,125.10. A jury trial that followed resulted in a verdict for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Inhabitants of Township v. WattersNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1901
  2. Crane v. ElySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1883

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Township of Ewing v. TrentonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
  2. Savage v. DowrieNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API