Legal Opinion

Hill v. Town of Chester

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 13, 2001No. 99-306PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNadeau, J.

The defendants, Town of Chester (town) and Town of Chester Zoning Board of Adjustment (ZBA), appeal the ruling of the Superior Court (Abramson, J.) reversing the ZBA’s denial of a variance to the plaintiffs, John Hill, III and Deborah Simard-Hill. We vacate and remand.

The relevant facts follow. In 1997, the plaintiffs paid $40.00 for a 1.3 acre parcel of land with 200 feet of frontage, referred to as Lot 6. They purchased it from the Simard Family Trust (Trust) by deed, which contained a reversionary interest for the Trust in the event that the plaintiffs failed to build a house on the lot…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Simplex Technologies, Inc. v. Town of NewingtonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  2. Trottier v. City of LebanonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  3. Twigg v. Town of KennebunkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  4. Olszak v. Town of New HamptonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  5. Ryan v. City of Manchester Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harrington v. Town of WarnerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  2. Fox v. Town of GreenlandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  3. NINE A, LLC v. Town of ChesterfieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  4. Roberts v. Town of WindhamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
  5. Shopland v. Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API