Shopland v. Town of Enfield
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.
The defendant, Town of Enfield (town), appeals an order of the Superior Court {Smith, J.) vacating the decision of the zoning board of adjustment (ZBA) denying a variance to the plaintiffs, Russell and Lindsay Shopland. We reverse and remand.
The following facts were found by the trial court or are evident from the record. The Shoplands own á seasonal cottage along the shores of Crystal Lake in the town of Enfield. The cottage consists of one room and a bathroom for a total of approximately 378 square feet of living space. The Shoplands wished to expand the cottage by building a two-bedroom,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Simplex Technologies, Inc. v. Town of NewingtonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- Britton v. Town of ChesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- Estate of Ireland v. Worcester InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- Duffy v. City of DoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- Boccia v. City of PortsmouthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harrington v. Town of WarnerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Chester Rod & Gun Club, Inc. v. Town of ChesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005