Legal Opinion

Shopland v. Town of Enfield

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 15, 2004No. 2002-812PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.

The defendant, Town of Enfield (town), appeals an order of the Superior Court {Smith, J.) vacating the decision of the zoning board of adjustment (ZBA) denying a variance to the plaintiffs, Russell and Lindsay Shopland. We reverse and remand.

The following facts were found by the trial court or are evident from the record. The Shoplands own á seasonal cottage along the shores of Crystal Lake in the town of Enfield. The cottage consists of one room and a bathroom for a total of approximately 378 square feet of living space. The Shoplands wished to expand the cottage by building a two-bedroom,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Simplex Technologies, Inc. v. Town of NewingtonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  2. Britton v. Town of ChesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  3. Estate of Ireland v. Worcester InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  4. Duffy v. City of DoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  5. Boccia v. City of PortsmouthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harrington v. Town of WarnerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  2. Chester Rod & Gun Club, Inc. v. Town of ChesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API