Legal Opinion
Sargent v. Genesco, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided January 28, 1972No. Civ. T. 71-197PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KRENTZMAN, District Judge.
This came before the Court upon a motion to require plaintiffs to furnish security filed by the defendant, Leeds Shoes, Inc. The motion is made pursuant to Florida Statutes §§ 608.13(14), 608.13(15), F.S.A., and the so-called security-for-expense statute, Fla.Stat. § 608.131, 1 F.S.A. Leeds Shoes, Inc. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida. 2 The provisions of the statutes apply to Leeds Shoes, Inc.
In support of the motion Leeds has submitted an affidavit of its secretary in which Article VII of the By-Laws of Leeds is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Maternally Yours, Inc. v. Your Maternity Shop, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- McClure v. Borne Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- John Hawes, Etc. v. Club Ecuestre El Comandante, Nancy Kreitzer v. Puerto Rican Cars, Inc., Daniel Ventura v. El Conquistador HotelCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Robert Colton v. John B. Swain, and Third-Party v. Pacific Indemnity Co., a Corporation, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Sargent v. Genesco, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1972