Legal Opinion
Radeschi v. Pennsylvania
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 20, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-1364PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
LEE, District Judge.
Before this Court are defendants’ Motion to Dismiss plaintiffs class action alleging age discrimination (Document No. 2) and their Supplemental Motion to Dismiss (Document No. 7). For the following reasons, the defendants’ Supplemental Motion to Dismiss will be granted and the case will be remanded to state court.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, Michael A. Radeschi, brings this class action against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and its Department of Labor and Industry alleging willful violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Halstead v. Motorcycle Safety Foundation Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Safety National Casualty Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1999
- Smith v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.