Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Baroni

Fayette County Court of Quarter Sessions

Decided August 21, 1945No. 36Published

1Dissent

Dumbauld, P. J.,

The conclusion reached by the majority of the court is so utterly in conflict with the facts, law, and inherent justice of the case, as they impress themselves upon me, that I am compelled to dissent and to place on record my reasons for such dissent. ■

Early in 1932, William H. Smart found himself in financial difficulties. At that time he was the owner of the legal title to eight contiguous lots of land, situate on Locust Street, in the City of Uniontown. On each of seven lots was located a frame house, of sufficient size to house a single family. Upon the eighth there was a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Allegheny By-Product Coke Co. v. J. H. Hillman & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Stewart v. KearneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1837
  4. E. W. Coast Service Corporation v. PapahagisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Kramer v. WinslowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API