Wiedner v. Katt
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtCubes, J.
Appellee filed application in the county court of Guadalupe county to probate the alleged last will and testament of his deceased wife, Lydia Katt. Appellants, as the heirs of Lydia Katt, filed their contest thereto, on the chief ground that Mrs. Katt had not the mental capacity to execute the will at the time of its execution, and its provisions were dictated by appellee to her, exercising undue influence over her mind, causing her to believe it was intending to constitute Emil A. W. Orth, the young man who had long lived with decedent and appellee, as their joint heir, etc.
Upon a hearing…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MurphyTexas Supreme Court · 1876
- Houston East & West Texas Railway Co. v. RunnelsTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Dwyer v. Bassett & BassettTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Blum v. StrongTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Biering v. First National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1888
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hudson v. FusonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Breeding v. NalerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938