United States v. Muriel-Cruz
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CYR, Senior Circuit Judge.
Alexander Muriel-Cruz contends that the district court failed to conduct a proper mental competency hearing prior to accepting his guilty plea to a drug conspiracy charge. See 18 U.S.C. § 4241(e). We affirm.
I
BACKGROUND
In August 2000, Muriel-Cruz and eight codefendants were jointly indicted on a single count of conspiring to distribute cocaine. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846. Thereafter, in February 2001, the district court 1 ordered that Muriel-Cruz undergo a pretrial mental competency evaluation at the Federal Medical Center (FMC) in But-ner, North Carolina. See 18…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. AntonakopoulosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Benjamin General, A/K/A BarkimCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Rivera-RosarioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Lorenzo Nichols, Howard MasonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Abraham Denkins, IICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Mississippi Public Employees' Retirement System v. Boston Scientific Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- United States v. SilvaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- United States v. AhrendtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Rojas TapiaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.