Legal Opinion

Grimpel v. Hochman

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided December 4, 1972PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwabd Goodell, J.

This is an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien based upon services performed and materials furnished *41by the plaintiff in connection with painting and paperhanging for the defendant.

The defendant bonded the lien, filed on June 10, 1968, by executing and filing a court-approved surety undertaking, dated October 9,1968, for the sum of $5,950 in accordance with orders dated October 3, 1968, and March 17, 1969, respectively, fixing the amount of the undertaking and discharging the lien of record. The plaintiff did not supplement his complaint.by adding a cause of action to recover upon the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Duplex Safety Boiler Co. v. . GardenNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. New Era Homes Corp. v. ForsterNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Durand Realty Co. v. StolmanNew York Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Consolidated Blasting Corp. v. Colabella Bros.New York Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Patterson v. Alabama Vermiculite Corp.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Todd Shipyards Corp. v. Cunard Line, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Pelc v. BergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. E-J Electric Installation Co. v. Miller & Raved, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. A & E Plumbing, Inc. v. BudoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  5. Todd Shipyards Corp. v. Cunard Line Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API