Legal Opinion

Frick v. Veazey

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided September 9, 1993No. 14822PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTZ, Judge.

Our original opinion in this case was filed on August 24, 1993. We affirmed the district court after Appellant failed to file a memorandum in response to our calendar notice proposing summary affirmance. On August 27, 1993, Appellant filed a motion for extension of time in which to file a brief in chief. Because the motion was filed after the filing of our opinion, we treat the motion as a motion for rehearing pursuant to SCRA 1986, 12-404 (Repl.Pamp.1992). We deny the motion.

The calendar notice filed on July 16, 1993, placed this case on our summary calendar. The…

2Cited by23 opinions

  1. Udall v. TownsendNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Arellano v. VelardeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Board of Education, Rio Rancho Public School District v. JohnsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Buttke v. Brown FamilyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Cach, LLC v. RileyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API