Legal Opinion

Cioe v. Petrocelli Electric Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 10, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*378Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert D. Lippmann, J.), entered April 19, 2005, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied the motion of defendant New York City Transit Authority (NYCTA) for summary judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of NYCTA dismissing the complaint as against it.

The duty to keep public sidewalks and roadways, including those adjacent to bus stops, in a reasonably safe condition and to repair any defects falls upon the municipality (Rubin v City of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bailey v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Pantazis v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Rubin v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hariri v. AmperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Cabrera v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API