Nirdlinger's Estate (No. 2)
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Schaefer,
For the first time there arises before this court the question of the apportionment between life tenant and remainderman of the proceeds of a mortgage investment, where a trustee has had to foreclose the mortgage, buy the property covered at the foreclosure sale, hold it for a time and then sell it at a loss. The question has arisen in several other jurisdictions. Most of them are in agreement that apportionment should be made: Perry on Trusts (7th Ed.), Sec. 548c; 4 Bogert on Trusts and Trustees, Sec. 820. They differ as to method and formula only: 4 Bogert on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re the Will of ChapalNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Edwards v. EdwardsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- In Re the Accounting of RowlandNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Wallace v. WallaceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
- In re the Estate of PelcygerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Pew TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Crawford EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Nirdlinger's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Crozer EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Fisher's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.