Legal Opinion

People v. Gonyea

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1985No. 71989, (Calendar No. 7)PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, C.J.

I. Introduction

The issue in this case is whether inculpatory statements deliberately elicited from a defendant by sheriffs detectives immediately after sentencing and in the absence of retained or appointed counsel are admissible under Const 1963, art 1, § 20 for impeachment purposes in a subsequent trial of the same cause. For purposes of this case, we do not decide whether the inculpatory state*465ments were involuntary or not. This is an issue of first impression in this Court and has not been ruled on by the United States Supreme Court.

The above issue arises from a situation where the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. SwallowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. People v. StacyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Martinez v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. State v. PickettCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
  5. People v. FrazierMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API