Legal Opinion

Golden Sun Feeds, Inc. v. Clark

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 8, 1966No. 51986PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The sole question' on this appeal by defendants is whether the trial court erred in finding they failed to prove their counterclaim. The judgment and decree foreclosing plaintiff’s chattel mortgage, which secured a promissory note and an account owed by defendants, is not otherwise challenged.

Defendant Jack D. Clark and his wife, at all times pertinent here, operated a. feedstore at Mystic. In 1959 he started selling feed supplied and manufactured by Foxbilt Feeds, Incorporated, of Des Moines. After attending Foxbilt sales meetings and gaining further knowledge he became a dealer, distributor…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sebastian v. WoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  2. Syester v. BantaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  3. King Features Syndicate v. CourrierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  4. Stricklen v. Pearson Construction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  5. Shannon v. GaarSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Holden v. Construction MacHinery CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  2. Schiltz v. Cullen-Schiltz & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  3. Pringle Tax Service, Inc. v. KnoblauchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  4. Rohlin Construction Co. v. City of HintonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  5. State of Iowa v. Terran E. RoacheSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API