Legal Opinion

People v. Kurtzman

California Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1988No. S003708PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARGUELLES, J.

Defendant, David Kenneth Kurtzman, appealed from a judgment of second degree murder, contending that his conviction was tainted by the trial court’s comments to the jury, during deliberations, that it must unanimously agree on whether defendant was guilty of second degree murder before “considering” voluntary manslaughter. We conclude that our decision in Stone v. Superior Court (1982) 31 Cal.3d 503 [183 Cal.Rptr. 647, 646 P.2d 809], properly interpreted, simply restricts a jury from returning a verdict on a lesser included offense before acquitting on a greater offense…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. People v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. People v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. People v. GreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. MacK v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  3. People v. WhartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. MickeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API