People v. Kurtzman
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARGUELLES, J.
Defendant, David Kenneth Kurtzman, appealed from a judgment of second degree murder, contending that his conviction was tainted by the trial court’s comments to the jury, during deliberations, that it must unanimously agree on whether defendant was guilty of second degree murder before “considering” voluntary manslaughter. We conclude that our decision in Stone v. Superior Court (1982) 31 Cal.3d 503 [183 Cal.Rptr. 647, 646 P.2d 809], properly interpreted, simply restricts a jury from returning a verdict on a lesser included offense before acquitting on a greater offense…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- People v. GreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- MacK v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. WhartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. MickeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.