CSU Holdings, Inc. v. Xerox Corp.
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
EARL E. O’CONNOR, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment on its willful patent infringement counterclaims (Doe. # 362) and defendant’s motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs’ antitrust claims (Doc. # 410). After careful consideration of the parties’ briefs and oral argument on defendant’s motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs’ antitrust claims, the court is prepared to rule. For the reasons set forth below, both motions are denied.
Summary Judgment Standards
Summary judgment is appropriate “if the pleadings,…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Indepen. Serv. Organiz. Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997