Legal Opinion

Straughan v. City of Coeur D'Alene

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1932No. Nos. 5905, 5905aPublished

1Opinion

ON REHEARING.

GIVENS, J.

While respondents do not raise the point, it has been suggested that the complaint is not sufficient to show that appellants are entitled to injunctive relief because they fail to indicate how they will, or may, be specifically injured by the proposed acquisition by the municipality of the utilities in question.

The complaint in substance as to this phase of the matter alleges that the appellants are taxpayers, residents and citizens, and at present patrons of the respective utilities exclusively serving the inhabitants of Coeur d’Alene; that the obligations will be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Milligan v. City of Miles CityMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Harris v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Doan v. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Oregon Short Line R. R. Co. v. BergIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Woodruff v. WeltonNebraska Supreme Court · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API