Legal Opinion
Western Hair Goods Co. v. B. R. Haberkorn Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1928PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtNorton, J.
The motion to set aside the service of the summons and complaint herein was made on the ground that the defendant is a foreign corporation and was not doing business within this State at the time the summons and complaint were served.
The plaintiff, a foreign corporation, is seeking to recover a judgment herein in the City Court of Buffalo, and claims- that jurisdiction of the defendant, a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware, was acquired by personal service, February 18, 1928, of the summons and complaint on Clarence L. Davis, who, in May, 1927, was the president…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. of Texas v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Holzer v. . Dodge BrothersNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Chipman, Ltd. v. Thomas B. Jeffery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Capello v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950