Legal Opinion

Noonan v. Buick Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 28, 1968No. 67-874PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

211 So.2d 54 (1968)

Carl R. NOONAN, Appellant,

v.

BUICK COMPANY, a Division of General Motors Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Appellee.

No. 67-874.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

May 28, 1968.

Rehearing Denied June 26, 1968.

Highsmith & Ezzo and James O. Nelson, Miami, for appellant.

Wicker, Smith, Pyszka, Blomqvist & Davant, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.

PEARSON, Judge.

The plaintiff appeals a final judgment dismissing his complaint. The complaint sounded in tort and alleged that defendant-appellee, Buick Company, sold appellant a negligently…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pinkerton-Hays Lumber Company v. PopeSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  2. Pope v. Pinkerton-Hays Lumber Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  3. Kathleen Citrus Land Co. v. City of LakelandSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  4. Keel v. Independent Life and Accident Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  5. Cole v. Exchange National Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of Florida · 1966

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Walton v. Chrysler Motor Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Tampa Electric Co. v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1973
  3. Linda McLeod v. American Motors Corporation, and American Motors Sales Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Evancho v. ThielDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  5. Hunt v. NowickiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API