Legal Opinion

Cole v. Exchange National Bank of Chicago

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 19, 1966No. 33409PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

183 So.2d 195 (1966)

Albert COLE et al., Petitioners,

v.

The EXCHANGE NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO, Respondent.

No. 33409.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January 19, 1966.

Rehearing Denied March 9, 1966.

Fuller Warren, Miami, and Shorenstein & Lewis, Miami Beach, for petitioners.

Ward & Ward and W.G. Ward, Miami, for respondent.

DREW, Justice.

This case originated as a suit to foreclose a mortgage brought by the bank, the present respondent. A motion to dismiss the complaint as not stating a cause of action was granted with prejudice by the Chancellor and an appeal taken to the District Court of Appeal, 3rd…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. North Shore Hospital, Inc. v. BarberSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
  2. Pinkerton-Hays Lumber Company v. PopeSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  3. Cross v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Ansin v. ThurstonSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  5. McBurnette v. Playground Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Arlt v. BuchananSupreme Court of Florida · 1966
  2. Evans v. GrayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  3. In Re Farmers' Co-Op of Arkansas & Oklahoma, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1984
  4. Allen v. Florida Power CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  5. Eurovest Ltd. v. BISCAYNE ISLAND TERRACE CORP.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API