Legal Opinion

Collector of Revenue v. Wiley

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 26, 2017No. ED 104958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., Presiding Judge

Introduction

This suit involves the payment of court costs in an action by the Collector of Revenue of the City of St. Louis (Collector) to recover delinquent personal property taxes owed by Greg Wiley (Wiley). Whey filed a motion to tax or retax costs, requesting a Rill refund of the $177.00 he paid in court costs, arguing that he should not be liable for costs that the Collector as plaintiff was statutorily exempt from paying. The trial court granted Whey a partial refund, and both Wiley and the Collector appeal. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Back…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Hagely v. Board of Education of Webster Groves School DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  3. Greenbriar Hills Country Club v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  4. Groves v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  5. Gash v. Lafayette CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harrison v. Volkswagen Grp. of Am., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API