Legal Opinion

Munden v. State

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1873PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Harrison. Tried below before the Hon. J. B. Williamson. The material facts of the ease are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

This was an indictment for an assault with, intent to murder.

It is very true, that a reasonable apprehension or belief that the defendant was about to receive some serious bodily injury, or that his life was then and there in danger, would excuse the party for using all necessary force to protect his life or his person. The court may not have stated the law with clearness, and in fact did not. It is not necessary that there should actually be danger, and that the jury should find that, as a substantive fact, there was danger to the life or person of the defendant. It is sufficient that a…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Newman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. Savage v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. On Motion for RehearingCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Bennefield v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Cheek v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1878

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API