Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Public Service Commission

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 14, 1960No. 47485PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRETT, Commissioner.

The double-track line of the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company runs through the City of Bellefontaine Neighbors, and since 1922 there has been a bridge over the tracks at Shepley Drive. Upon complaint of the city and a tendered proposal for “reconstruction,” the Public Service Commission found that the bridge “was in a deteriorated and run-down condition,” that it was dangerous and inadequate to handle present day traffic, that it would be improvident to repair the bridge at an estimated cost of $20,000 and if repaired would not sustain the required “load…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Arnold v. May Department Stores Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  4. State ex rel. Kansas City Terminal Railway Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  5. State ex rel. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kansas City v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  2. State ex rel. City of Neosho v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  3. State Ex Rel. Kansas City v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  4. State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API