Legal Opinion

Richards v. Hanover Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 8, 1982No. 64048PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Banke, Judge.

The appellant and her husband purchased a policy of homeowner’s insurance from the appellee insurance company covering a newly acquired house and its contents. A few months later, the house and its contents were damaged by fire. This suit was filed to recover for property damage and additional living expenses in accordance with the terms of the policy.

The claimants made no repairs on the structure, as their mortgagee, whose interest was also covered by the policy, regained the property by foreclosure subsequent to the fire. The husband did not appear at trial, and evidence was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Fire Insurance v. BanisterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  2. American Casualty Co. v. Parks-Chambers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. American Cas. Co. v. Parks-Chambers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Richards v. Hanover InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. Richards v. Hanover InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  3. Richards v. Hanover InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API