Chicago &. N. W. Ry. Co. v. Railroad & Warehouse Commission
District Court, D. Minnesota
In Equity. Suit by the Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company against the Railroad and Warehouse Commission of Minnesota and others to enjoin the enforcement of a state statute. On final hearing. Decree for permanent injunction directed.
Read the full summary
In Equity. Suit by the Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company against the Railroad and Warehouse Commission of Minnesota and others to enjoin the enforcement of a state statute. On final hearing. Decree for permanent injunction directed. This is a suit brought by plaintiff for an injunction to restrain the defendants and each of them from enforcing against the plaintiff certain state laws of the state of Minnesota, to wit, chapter 514, Session Laws 1919, as amended by chapter 481, Session Laws of 1921; the latter act amending section 3 only of the original act. Jurisdiction is based upon the…
1Opinion of the CourtBooth, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The statute in question reads as follows:
“Chapter 514 — H. B. No. 143.
“An act requiring railroads, car shops and other concerns manufacturing or repairing ears, car trucks, and other equipment used as conveyances by rail, for either freight or passengers, and other equipment used in repair work or otherwise, and operated by railroad companies, to provide buildings that will! protect their employés from heat, rain, cold, snow, and other inclement weather.
“Be it enacted by -the Legislature of the State of Minnesota:
“Section 1. Buildings for Employés. — That…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- St. Patrick's Church Corporation v. DanielsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Hunt v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940
- Boshuizen v. Thompson & Taylor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1935
- Burr v. RagoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- McFarland v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.