Legal Opinion

Richardson v. . Egerton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 24, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlakicsoN, J.

The Constitution of North Carolina, Art. IV, sec. 27, is as follows: “The several justices of the peace shall have jurisdiction, under such regulations as the General Assembly shall prescribe, of civil actions founded on contract, wherein the sum demanded shall not exceed two hundred dollars, and wherein the title to real estate shall not be in controversy; and of all criminal matters arising within their counties where the punishment cannot exceed a fine of fifty dollars or imprisonment for thirty days. And the General Assembly may give to justices of the peace jurisdiction of other civil…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  2. Houser Ex Rel. Oakes v. BonsalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Duckworth v. Mull.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Watson v. Farmer.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SaxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. State v. . MansfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. Thayer v. . ThayerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Thayer ex rel. Hall v. ThayerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. State v. SaxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API