Legal Opinion

Rowe v. Haines

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1860PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from the Tippecanoe Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtWobden, J.

Haines, as indorsee, sued Rowe, as maker, of two promissory notes. Judgment for the plaintiff. Rowe appeals, and makes two points for the reversal of the judgment. First: that there was a trial without an issue upon an affirmative paragraph of his answer. The attention of the Court below was not called to this defect, in any manner whatever; and it has been determined, in several cases, that judgment will not be reversed in this Court for such cause, unless advantage was sought to be taken of the irregularity in the Court below.

E. A. Greenlee, for appellant. D. Mace, for appellee.

Second: that…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Valette v. MasonIndiana Supreme Court · 1849

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Felton v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Sears v. Lantz & BatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  3. Straughan v. FairchildIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Baxter v. MooreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Nickless v. PearsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API